Freehand Studio · AI Agent · Trade & Compliance

Compliance Screening Agent: Every Counterparty Screened Against the Current Restricted Party List

All counterparties screened against current restricted party lists from OFAC, BIS, EU, UN, and country-specific authorities at every transaction. Matches and near-matches held for review. Every decision documented. Freehand's Compliance Screening Agent closes the onboarding-to-execution gap.

Shipper
3PL
LSP
Carrier
Service Provider
Every transaction
Screened against current restricted party lists not just at onboarding
Zero
Restricted party exposure between annual rescreening cycles
100%
Of counterparties monitored continuously customers, suppliers, carriers, forwarders
Trusted by global leaders in logistics, manufacturing, and retail
Awards and Recognitions
The Problem

Sanctions Lists Change. One-Time Onboarding Screens Do Not Protect the Transactions That Follow.

Restricted party screening is a regulatory requirement but it is often done once at vendor onboarding and forgotten. Sanctions lists change. Entities are added without notice. A single transaction with a restricted party can trigger penalties that dwarf the value of the trade.

Onboarding Screening Leaves Ongoing Exposure

A counterparty that cleared screening at onboarding may be added to a sanctions list months or years later. Without continuous monitoring, every transaction after the list change is a potential violation. The compliance program has a structural gap between onboarding and execution.

Sanctions List Changes Are Frequent and Unannounced

OFAC, BIS, EU, UN, and country-specific authorities add entities to restricted party lists without advance notice. Organizations that rely on annual rescreening are exposed for up to 12 months after a designation is made.

Near-Match Risk Not Managed

Exact name matching misses near-match risk parties with similar names, transliteration variants, and affiliated entities. Without fuzzy matching and structured review workflows, genuine compliance risk passes undetected.

Counterparty Population Is Larger Than Managed

Compliance screening is often applied to direct suppliers and customers only. Carriers, consignees, freight forwarders, and intermediary banks are counterparties who may not be in the standard screening population creating coverage gaps.

Screening Documentation Incomplete for Audit

When a regulatory authority audits trade compliance, documentation of screening decisions must be available for every relevant transaction. Incomplete screening records create audit risk independent of whether a violation occurred.

Transaction-Level Hold Workflow Not Systematic

When a potential match is detected, the decision about whether to hold, escalate, or clear the transaction is often made informally. Without a structured review workflow, determination quality depends on individual judgment.

What the Agent Does

Screen Every Transaction. Hold Matches. Document Everything.

Screens all counterparties against current restricted party lists from OFAC, BIS, EU, UN, and country-specific authorities at every transaction. Near-matches flagged and held for review. Cleared transactions proceed. Every decision documented for compliance audit.

Transaction-Level Screening

Every transaction screened against current restricted party lists at the moment of execution. A counterparty newly designated between transactions is caught before the next transaction clears.

Full Counterparty Population Coverage

Screening applied to the full counterparty population: customers, suppliers, carriers, consignees, freight forwarders, intermediary banks, and beneficial owners. No category of trading party is excluded from the screening population.

Near-Match Detection and Review Workflow

Fuzzy matching logic identifies near-matches name variants, transliterations, affiliated entities alongside exact matches. Potential matches routed to a structured review workflow with match details and supporting documentation assembled.

Current List Feed Integration

Transactions where a match or near-match is detected are automatically held pending compliance review. Escalation workflows route high-confidence matches to senior review. Held transactions tracked until reviewed and resolved.

Transaction Hold and Escalation

Transactions where a match or near-match is detected are automatically held pending compliance review. Escalation workflows route high-confidence matches to senior compliance review. Cleared transactions proceed. Held transactions are tracked until reviewed and resolved.

Complete Compliance Documentation

Every screening decision logged with the counterparty screened, the list version used, the result, the reviewer identity if a review was triggered, and the final determination. Complete audit trail available for regulatory authority review for every transaction.

Agent Handoffs

From Trade Documents to Screened, Cleared Transactions

Receives trade document and classification data from upstream agents. Delivers screening results and compliance documentation downstream. Triggers the Alerting Agent on confirmed matches.

Receives from

  • Product HS classifications and trade document data from the HS Classification Agent used to enrich screening records with product context for export control cross-referencing alongside counterparty screening.

Alerting Agent

  • FTA qualification determinations and certificate of origin records from the FTA Qualification Agent used to verify trade document completeness as part of the compliance screening record.

Broker Audit Agent

  • Audited customs entry records from the Broker Audit Agent used to cross-reference counterparty identities in broker-filed entries against the screening population.

This Agent

Compliance Screening Agent

  • Screens every counterparty against current restricted party lists at every transaction. Flags matches and near-matches for review. Holds transactions pending clearance. Documents every screening decision for compliance audit.

Triggers

  • Confirmed matches, high-confidence near-matches, and screening threshold breach notifications routed through the Alerting Agent to trade compliance, legal, and finance leadership immediately.
Before AI → After AI

What Changes When Compliance Screening Runs on the Agent

The restricted party lists do not change. The frequency and coverage of how your transactions are checked against them does.

Before the Agent
With Compliance Screening Agent
Counterparties screened at onboarding. List changes between transactions go unmonitored. Restricted party transaction risk exists for the full period between annual rescreening cycles.
Every transaction screened against current restricted party lists at execution. A counterparty newly designated after onboarding is caught before the next transaction clears.
Annual rescreening covers direct suppliers and customers only. Carriers, consignees, and freight forwarders are outside the screening population a structural gap in coverage.
Full counterparty population screened: customers, suppliers, carriers, consignees, forwarders, and intermediary banks. No trading party category excluded.
Exact name matching misses near-match risk name variants, transliterations, affiliated entities. Genuine compliance risk passes undetected without fuzzy matching.
Fuzzy matching identifies near-matches alongside exact matches. Potential matches routed to a structured review workflow with supporting documentation assembled for the reviewer.
Screening documentation is inconsistent. When an authority audits trade compliance, the documentation required for every relevant transaction may not exist in an acceptable format.
Every screening decision logged with counterparty, list version, result, and reviewer identity. Complete audit trail available for every transaction immediately.
Transaction holds managed informally when a potential match is detected. Determination quality depends on individual judgment. No structured review workflow or escalation path.
Structured hold and escalation workflow triggered automatically on match detection. Reviewer receives full match context. Determination documented and tracked to resolution.
Measured Outcomes

Results from Live Deployments

Outcomes measured from life sciences, industrial, consumer goods, and logistics service provider deployments across global trade operations.

Every transaction
Screened against current restricted party lists not just at onboarding
Zero
Restricted party exposure between annual rescreening cycles
100%
Of counterparties monitored continuously customers, suppliers, carriers, forwarders

Every transaction screened at execution. Newly designated counterparties caught before the next transaction.

Full counterparty population covered including carriers, consignees, and forwarders.

Near-match detection with fuzzy matching. Potential matches held for structured review.

Every screening decision documented for audit. Complete trail for every transaction.

Connects to OFAC, BIS, EU, UN, Descartes, Dow Jones, Thomson Reuters, ERP, and TMS on day one.

Scales with transaction volume and counterparty count. No incremental compliance headcount.

Integrations

Works Where Your Counterparty and Transaction Data Already Lives

Reads from restricted party list feeds, ERP, and TMS. Holds flagged transactions and logs every screening decision to compliance archives natively.

Restricted Party Lists

Descartes · Dow Jones · Thomson Reuters · OFAC · BIS

OFAC SDN and non-SDN lists, BIS Entity and Denied Parties lists, EU consolidated list, and UN Security Council lists consumed via Descartes, Dow Jones, and Thomson Reuters REST API feeds with continuous updates.

ERP

SAP S/4HANA · Oracle Fusion · Dynamics 365

Counterparty master data customers, suppliers, beneficial owners consumed from ERP via BAPI and REST for the primary screening population.

TMS

SAP TM · Blue Yonder

Carrier, consignee, and freight forwarder identity data from TMS used to extend the screening population beyond ERP-managed counterparties.

Trade Documents

ERP · Freehand Trade Records

Transaction-level order, shipment, and payment data from ERP and Freehand used to trigger screening at the moment of execution.

Middleware

MuleSoft · Dell Boomi · Seeburger BIS

Transaction and counterparty data flowing through your integration layer accessed without compliance screening pipeline disruption.

Procurement

Coupa · SAP Ariba

Supplier and procurement transaction data from P2P platforms consumed for screening at purchase order and payment execution.

Screening Log

Screening Result Log per Transaction

Every screening decision logged in Freehand with counterparty, list version, result, match confidence, and reviewer identity for complete audit trail.

Transaction Hold

Transaction Hold Workflow

Transactions where a match or near-match is detected held in Freehand and ERP pending compliance review and determination.

Compliance Archive

SharePoint / OneDrive

Screening records and compliance documentation archived in SharePoint via Graph API for regulatory authority review and internal compliance reporting.

Alerts

MS Teams / Slack / ServiceNow

Match alerts and high-confidence near-match notifications delivered to trade compliance and legal leadership via webhook and REST immediately.

Data Lake

Snowflake / Databricks

Screening records and compliance analytics written to your data lake for enterprise compliance reporting and audit documentation.

ACE

ACE Customs Records

Screening records cross-referenced with broker-filed customs entries for counterparty identity verification in ACE records.

3,400
Active counterparties screened in life sciences deployment 7 near-matches identified in first 90 days
2
Transaction holds that prevented regulatory exposure in first 90 days
100%
Of transactions screened at execution not at onboarding only
Day 1
Connected to OFAC, BIS, EU, UN, Descartes, Dow Jones, ERP, and TMS from go-live
Case Studies

3,400 Counterparties. 7 Near-Matches. 2 Transaction Holds. 90 Days.

Real outcomes from enterprises running the Compliance Screening Agent in production.

Case Study 01

Life Sciences Company Global Export

Life sciences company with a global export program and 3,400 active counterparties. Prior screening limited to onboarding checks. No transaction-level screening and no near-match detection in place before deployment.

Life Sciences · Global Export · 3,400 Counterparties

7 near-matches

Identified and reviewed in first 90 days

2 transaction holds

That would have created regulatory exposure

  • 7 near-matches identified and reviewed in the first 90 days across 3,400 active counterparties all invisible to the prior onboarding-only screening process
  • 2 of the 7 near-matches resulted in transaction holds that prevented transactions that would have created regulatory exposure under OFAC and BIS requirements
  • Complete screening audit trail established for every transaction from day one resolving a documentation gap that had created audit risk independent of whether any violation had occurred.
Case Study 02

Global Industrial Manufacturer

Global industrial manufacturer with an annual rescreening program covering direct suppliers and customers only. Carriers and freight forwarders were outside the screening population a gap discovered during a trade compliance self-assessment.

Industrial Manufacturing · Annual Rescreening · Coverage Gap

100%

Of counterparty population covered carriers and forwarders added

Zero

Compliance incidents since deployment continuous monitoring replaced annual rescreening

  • Full counterparty population brought under continuous screening including carriers and freight forwarders that had been outside the prior annual rescreening scope
  • One carrier identified as a near-match to a newly designated entity the designation had occurred 4 months after the most recent annual rescreening, making it invisible to the prior process.
  • Complete screening documentation established for every transaction, enabling the organization to demonstrate a systematic compliance program to trade authorities during a subsequent trade compliance review
Technology

Powered by the Freehand Context Graph

Compliance screening is only effective when it runs at the moment of execution not months before it.

The Context Graph connects counterparty master data from ERP, carrier and forwarder identity from TMS, transaction records, and restricted party list feeds from Descartes, Dow Jones, and Thomson Reuters into the unified screening context. Every transaction is screened against the current list at the moment it executes.

Built on the Freehand Logistics Language Model, trained on restricted party screening frameworks, sanctions list structures, fuzzy matching methodologies, and compliance documentation requirements across OFAC, BIS, EU, and UN programs. It understands near-match risk and the difference between a genuine compliance concern and a common name coincidence.

  • Every screening decision is fully documented. The counterparty screened, the list version, the match confidence score, the reviewer identity, and the final determination are all logged at the moment of execution. Complete compliance audit trail for every transaction.
  • The Context Graph learns from review outcomes. Near-match determinations that were cleared or held update the matching sensitivity for similar future patterns. Accuracy improves as the agent builds familiarity with the organization's counterparty base.
  • Compliance screening intelligence connects to every agent that interacts with counterparties. The Alerting Agent receives confirmed match notifications immediately. Broker audit records cross-referenced for counterparty identity verification in ACE entries.
Architecture Overview
DATA LAYER AI TEAM Contracted Rates Carrier Invoices Shipment Events EDI Feeds ERP Exports Rate Cards CG Context Graph Freehand LLM Unified Semantic Layer Domain-Specific AI Self-Learning Model IA Invoice Audit Agent 100% invoice coverage GL GL Coding Agent GL posting & allocation AF Accrual & Forecast Agent Live spend accruals SI Spend Intelligence Agent Finance-grade data ERP OUTPUT SAP · Oracle Cloud · Oracle JDE · NetSuite · via API & EDI
FAQ

Compliance Screening: Questions Trade and Legal Leaders Ask

Straight answers to what trade compliance and legal leaders ask before deploying the Compliance Screening Agent.

Which restricted party lists does the agent screen against?
+

OFAC SDN and non-SDN lists, BIS Entity and Denied Parties lists, EU consolidated list, UN Security Council list, and country-specific lists via Descartes, Dow Jones, and Thomson Reuters. Lists updated continuously every screening decision runs against the current version.

How does the agent handle near-matches?
+

Fuzzy matching logic detects name variants, transliterations, and affiliated entity connections alongside exact matches. Near-matches above a configured confidence threshold are held pending review. The reviewer receives the match details, list context, and supporting documentation.

What counterparties are screened?
+

All counterparties in the trading relationship: customers, suppliers, carriers, consignees, freight forwarders, intermediary banks, and beneficial owners. The screening population extends beyond ERP-managed entities to include TMS carrier and forwarder records.

What happens when a transaction is held?
+

Transaction held in Freehand and ERP pending compliance review. Escalation workflow triggered based on match confidence level. Reviewer receives full context for determination. Decision and rationale logged. Transaction cleared or blocked based on the determination.

How does the Compliance Screening Agent fit into the Freehand pipeline?
+

Receives trade document and HS classification data from the HS Classification Agent, FTA qualification records from the FTA Qualification Agent, and audited entry data from the Broker Audit Agent. Triggers the Alerting Agent immediately on confirmed or high-confidence matches.

How quickly can the Compliance Screening Agent be deployed?
+

Deployable in days via pre-built connectors to restricted party list feeds, ERP counterparty data, and TMS carrier records. Most enterprises have transaction-level screening running across the full counterparty population within the first week of deployment.

Get Started

Deploy the Compliance Screening Agent Across Your Trade Operations

Every transaction screened. Every near-match reviewed. Every decision documented. Deployable in days.

Built on Freehand Studio · freehand.ai

See how Freehand recovers margin you're already losing

Map your commercial agreements to real-world execution - recovering 2-5% in lost margins and ensuring 100% audit coverage.

What to expect in the call

We identify exactly where you’re leaking margins

See how our AI Teams cross-check contracts, and resolve overcharges

Get a savings estimate based on your current spend and systems.

Trusted & Recognized by

KEARNEY
pwc
Gartner

See AI teams in action